Another quotation from N. Scott Momaday on storytellers and storytelling. I think there are some ideas expressed in them that wouldn't be accepted favorably by modern critics, and, perhaps, by some not-so-modern critics and scholars. .
Stories are composed of words and of such implications as the storyteller places upon the words. The choice of words, their arrangement, and their effect are by and large determined by the storyteller. The storyteller exercises nearly complete control over the storytelling experience.
. . . . .
Stories are true to our common experience; they are statements which concern the human condition. To the extent that the human condition involves moral considerations, stories have moral implications. Beyond that, stories are true in that they are established squarely upon belief. In the oral tradition stories are told not merely to entertain or to instruct; they are told to be believed. Stories are not subject to the imposition of such questions as true or false, act or fiction. Stories are realities lived and believed. They are true.
-- N. Scott Momaday --
The Man Made of Words
Aside from John Gardner, I wonder how many critics, scholars, and readers will accept Momaday's statement that stories have moral implications.
I'm not sure exactly what Momaday means by Stories are not subject to the imposition of such questions as true
or false, act or fiction. Stories are realities lived and believed.
They are true. I think he suggests the stories somehow are not to be judged by our ordinary commonsense ways of thinking, but exist somehow in another place.
Any thoughts?