The following is a quotation from Carrots for Michaelmas, a blog belonging to Haley Stewart. This link will take you to the complete article. http://tinyurl.com/hthjuep
I want to thank Di from The Little White Attic who alerted me to this article, "In Defense of Fanny Price,"from which this quotation was taken.
Mansfield Park is about superficiality versus
substance. It’s about charm versus goodness. It’s about mere
conventional propriety versus true virtue and it’s hard for an
entertainment-obsessed culture that glorifies appearances and laughs at
the idea of character to understand. All of the characters struggle and
are tried and tested…but some fight the good fight and others reveal
that they never had virtue to begin with.
This is the best, the most coherent, the clearest statement of the main point of Mansfield Part I have ever read. In a few words she expressed what I've been trying to say for years.
Thank you, Haley Stewart.
Showing posts with label Mansfield Park. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mansfield Park. Show all posts
Friday, January 27, 2017
Friday, December 16, 2016
Jane Austen's Fanny Price: A Taoist Sage at Mansfield Park
Jane Austen
Mansfield Park
Jane Austen was born on December 16, 1775 and died on July 18, 1817.
Fanny Price, of Mansfield Park, (MP) is probably the most maligned of Austen's heroines. Just why is not clear to me, but I suspect it's a classic example of imposing 21st century standards on 19th century characters and a misreading of Austen in general. Too many readers fall in love with Liz Bennet's lively, outgoing, and cheeky behavior and therefore insist that all of Austen's heroines be the same. In fact, three of Austen's heroines do fit this category: Liz, of course, Emma (Emma), and to a considerable extent Catherine (Northanger Abbey) , the youngest of the heroines.
But, Austen also has three quiet, more reserved heroines: Elinor (Sense and Sensibility), Anne (Persuasion), and Fanny (MP). What I find interesting, is that, though the heroine is the quiet reserved type, there is another woman who exemplifies the more outgoing lively woman, the "Liz" type if I may so call her. Paired off with Elinor is her sister Marianne, who exemplifies the romantic enthusiastic outgoing follower of sensibility; with Anne is again her sister Elizabeth (interesting choice for her name) who is certainly more outgoing and demonstrative than Anne; and with Fanny, of course, is Mary Crawford, whom some readers want to be the heroine of MP in spite of her selfish, egotistic, insensitive, amoral, and manipulative behavior.
Mary Crawford is Austen's point that being bright, lively, and vivacious does not necessarily make one a good person (notice how many male villains in Austen are the same type), for those are external attributes. Liz is a good person because of what's inside her, not because of how she appears to others. The same is true of Fanny, for it is what is inside her that makes her a good person. What makes Mary a bad person is what's inside of her and those who admire her are those who see the surface only. Telling this sort of critic that you can't tell a book by its cover is a waste of time, for they are enthralled, fooled, duped by external glamour and never get beyond that.
Many commentators have insisted that Fanny shouldn't be the heroine, nor does she deserve to be happily married at the end. She has done nothing to deserve her fate. Mary should be the real heroine and gain Edmund as her reward. Of course, these are the same people who deride Edmund as being dull, uninteresting, and priggish. I can only wonder how they could see Edmund and Mary together. I wonder how long Mary would be a faithful wife to Edmund, a country minister, and also how long her brother Henry, who is the male version of a lively, outgoing, charming suitor, would remain satisfied with the dull, priggish Fanny, as they see her.
One theme in MP that has surprised me is the number of characters in the story who have improved, inexplicably over the length of the novel. In Austen's novels, it's usually the heroine and the hero who have learned something about themselves and have managed to more or less overcome their failings (Emma, I must admit, is a question mark here), but in this novel, a number of other characters, especially in the Bertram family, have developed, more or less, a sense of responsibility and concern for others, which was lacking in the beginning.
It is this that started me thinking. I could find no particular or obvious reason for these changes in the characters. No one lectures them and seldom are they called upon to recognize their shortcomings. The changes seem to happen in a vacuum--mysteriously.
It was about this time, the third or fourth reading of MP, that, from the depths of my sub- or unconscious that there is something Taoist about Fannie's behavior. I wondered how a Taoist might view this novel. I am not an expert in Taoism, but I have read a little ("a little learning is a dangerous thing"), just enough to get me in trouble here. So, I dug out my copy of Laotse's (aka Lao Tzu) Tao Te Ching and found some intriguing characteristics of the Taoist Sage.
I am not saying that Jane Austen deliberately created Fanny as a Taoist Sage or even that she was aware of Taoism. This is simply a view of MP as it might be seen by a Taoist.
THE TAOIST SAGE
Just what is a Taoist sage and how does one recognize one?
Chapter 2
The Sage:one who manages affairs without action, preaches without words, acts, but does not appropriate claim or ownership, and accomplishes but claims no credit.
This clearly could be Fanny as many of her detractors point out that she is far too quiescent for their tastes.
Chapter 9
The Sage retires when the work is done:
Fanny seldom if ever claims credit for what she accomplishes. She does what she is expected to do and says little about it.
chapter 17
But of the best sages, when their task is accomplished and their work is done,
the people will all remark, "We have done it ourselves."
Fanny seldom gets credit for what she does, even though near the end of the novel, Lady Bertram declares she can't get along without Fanny. This is the reason Susan will move to Mansfield Park to take Fanny's place.
Chapter 22
The Sage does not:reveal himself, justify himself, boast of himself, or act proudly.
He acts in accordance with the situation and does not force himself or his ideas on others. He acts as an example for others, so his influence is subtle and non-assertive.
This is true of Fanny. She listens and observes and only expresses an opinion when asked. And, few ask her besides Edmund.
All of the above observations come from the Wisdom of LaoTse, translated and edited by Lin Yutang,
THE CHARACTERS
I mentioned above that many of the characters had undergone significant changes by the end of the novel. Here is a brief description of the major characters at the beginning of the novel and the changes they undergo to reach the place where they are at the end. .
The Prices (Fanny's family)
William
Fanny's brother in the navy who gets necessary sponsorship for promotion from Sir Thomas. Sir Thomas would never have met William if if weren't for Fannie and the impression she made on Sir Thomas.
Fanny
her marriage, far above her class status to Edmund
Susan
Fanny's sister, ends up replacing Fanny at Mansfield Park.
THE BERTRAMS (at Mansfield Park)
Sir Thomas
In the beginning of the novel, he is an absent father and head of the household, and this is true whether he is off in the West Indies or at home. He does not take his proper place as father and lord of the manor. He also knows that his wife is unable or unwilling to play her part, so he allows Aunt Norris to become a dictator and rule his household. Later, though, he suddenly realizes the problems that his family is having are at least partially due to his abdication of responsibility, and he now begins to assert himself as head of household.
Lady Bertram
She seems totally detached from the family. Her main concerns seem to be herself and her dog. Again, near the end, when Tom becomes deathly ill, she rouses herself and spends most of her time at his bedside nursing him. This is a considerable change from her earlier behavior when the reader isn't sure whether she really is aware of anyone, aside from her pet dog, around her.
Tom
The eldest son plays to perfection the role of The Wastrel. He shows no interest in his studies at college, and demonstrates little concern nor for his duties and responsibilities as heir to Mansfield Park. It's party time is his philosophy. Shortly after his illness, he also changes his behavior and settles down at the university and begins to show an interest in his role as heir to Mansfield Park. There is also a hint of marriage, which is a major concern of every well-established family--the heir must marry and produce an heir of his own.
Edmund
While he is a serious and dedicated student, determined to be a good minister to his parish when he takes over, he also is infatuated by Mary Crawford, who would make a most inappropriate wife for the clergyman he wants to be. Again, at the end, he recognizes the folly of his infatuation and gradually comes to realize that Fanny is the woman most suited for him and his role in life.
Maria
The oldest daughter, selfish and self-absorbed, thinks only of herself. She makes a bad choice in her marriage, selecting a suitor who could never be a suitable partner but has a large house and a considerable fortune. For her follies she ends up in exile, supported by Sir Thomas, but banned, at least for now, from Mansfield Park.
Julia
She is strongly influenced by her older sister. Austen seems to suggest she would be a different person if she had a different older sister to model.
Aunt Norris
Sister to Lady Bertram and Mrs. Price (Fanny's mother)
She is the real power in the house. Unfortunately she is also evil, greedy, and malicious. She is the one who most deliberately torments Fanny, reminding regularly of her low position at Mansfield Park, barely one step above the servants. At the end, she realizes that Sir Thomas has recognized his error and has finally become the head of household he should have been long ago, and she elects to go into voluntary exile with Maria.
Mary and Henry Crawford
brother and sister, relatives to the minister at MP. They are bright, outgoing, attractive, as well as shallow, selfish, and self-absorbed. They are classic examples of the cliche that one can't tell a book by its cover. They are very popular at first, but by the end, they have revealed themselves take themselves off to London, perhaps to wonder for the rest of their lives just what they had missed out on.
Mansfield Park is the longest and most complex novel that Austen wrote. It is. in my estimation, the most misunderstood and misread novel as well. Austen's basic tenet, in all her works, is that one must look beneath the surface to determine the true nature of the other, and that true nature may be in opposition to what appears on the surface. I believe that too many readers have taken the surface appearances of many of the characters and stopped there, and therefore missing their true nature.
In any case, read and enjoy. I rank it a close second to Persuasion.
Mansfield Park
Jane Austen was born on December 16, 1775 and died on July 18, 1817.
Fanny Price, of Mansfield Park, (MP) is probably the most maligned of Austen's heroines. Just why is not clear to me, but I suspect it's a classic example of imposing 21st century standards on 19th century characters and a misreading of Austen in general. Too many readers fall in love with Liz Bennet's lively, outgoing, and cheeky behavior and therefore insist that all of Austen's heroines be the same. In fact, three of Austen's heroines do fit this category: Liz, of course, Emma (Emma), and to a considerable extent Catherine (Northanger Abbey) , the youngest of the heroines.
But, Austen also has three quiet, more reserved heroines: Elinor (Sense and Sensibility), Anne (Persuasion), and Fanny (MP). What I find interesting, is that, though the heroine is the quiet reserved type, there is another woman who exemplifies the more outgoing lively woman, the "Liz" type if I may so call her. Paired off with Elinor is her sister Marianne, who exemplifies the romantic enthusiastic outgoing follower of sensibility; with Anne is again her sister Elizabeth (interesting choice for her name) who is certainly more outgoing and demonstrative than Anne; and with Fanny, of course, is Mary Crawford, whom some readers want to be the heroine of MP in spite of her selfish, egotistic, insensitive, amoral, and manipulative behavior.
Mary Crawford is Austen's point that being bright, lively, and vivacious does not necessarily make one a good person (notice how many male villains in Austen are the same type), for those are external attributes. Liz is a good person because of what's inside her, not because of how she appears to others. The same is true of Fanny, for it is what is inside her that makes her a good person. What makes Mary a bad person is what's inside of her and those who admire her are those who see the surface only. Telling this sort of critic that you can't tell a book by its cover is a waste of time, for they are enthralled, fooled, duped by external glamour and never get beyond that.
Many commentators have insisted that Fanny shouldn't be the heroine, nor does she deserve to be happily married at the end. She has done nothing to deserve her fate. Mary should be the real heroine and gain Edmund as her reward. Of course, these are the same people who deride Edmund as being dull, uninteresting, and priggish. I can only wonder how they could see Edmund and Mary together. I wonder how long Mary would be a faithful wife to Edmund, a country minister, and also how long her brother Henry, who is the male version of a lively, outgoing, charming suitor, would remain satisfied with the dull, priggish Fanny, as they see her.
One theme in MP that has surprised me is the number of characters in the story who have improved, inexplicably over the length of the novel. In Austen's novels, it's usually the heroine and the hero who have learned something about themselves and have managed to more or less overcome their failings (Emma, I must admit, is a question mark here), but in this novel, a number of other characters, especially in the Bertram family, have developed, more or less, a sense of responsibility and concern for others, which was lacking in the beginning.
It is this that started me thinking. I could find no particular or obvious reason for these changes in the characters. No one lectures them and seldom are they called upon to recognize their shortcomings. The changes seem to happen in a vacuum--mysteriously.
It was about this time, the third or fourth reading of MP, that, from the depths of my sub- or unconscious that there is something Taoist about Fannie's behavior. I wondered how a Taoist might view this novel. I am not an expert in Taoism, but I have read a little ("a little learning is a dangerous thing"), just enough to get me in trouble here. So, I dug out my copy of Laotse's (aka Lao Tzu) Tao Te Ching and found some intriguing characteristics of the Taoist Sage.
I am not saying that Jane Austen deliberately created Fanny as a Taoist Sage or even that she was aware of Taoism. This is simply a view of MP as it might be seen by a Taoist.
THE TAOIST SAGE
Just what is a Taoist sage and how does one recognize one?
Chapter 2
The Sage:one who manages affairs without action, preaches without words, acts, but does not appropriate claim or ownership, and accomplishes but claims no credit.
This clearly could be Fanny as many of her detractors point out that she is far too quiescent for their tastes.
Chapter 9
The Sage retires when the work is done:
Fanny seldom if ever claims credit for what she accomplishes. She does what she is expected to do and says little about it.
chapter 17
But of the best sages, when their task is accomplished and their work is done,
the people will all remark, "We have done it ourselves."
Fanny seldom gets credit for what she does, even though near the end of the novel, Lady Bertram declares she can't get along without Fanny. This is the reason Susan will move to Mansfield Park to take Fanny's place.
Chapter 22
The Sage does not:reveal himself, justify himself, boast of himself, or act proudly.
He acts in accordance with the situation and does not force himself or his ideas on others. He acts as an example for others, so his influence is subtle and non-assertive.
This is true of Fanny. She listens and observes and only expresses an opinion when asked. And, few ask her besides Edmund.
All of the above observations come from the Wisdom of LaoTse, translated and edited by Lin Yutang,
THE CHARACTERS
I mentioned above that many of the characters had undergone significant changes by the end of the novel. Here is a brief description of the major characters at the beginning of the novel and the changes they undergo to reach the place where they are at the end. .
The Prices (Fanny's family)
William
Fanny's brother in the navy who gets necessary sponsorship for promotion from Sir Thomas. Sir Thomas would never have met William if if weren't for Fannie and the impression she made on Sir Thomas.
Fanny
her marriage, far above her class status to Edmund
Susan
Fanny's sister, ends up replacing Fanny at Mansfield Park.
THE BERTRAMS (at Mansfield Park)
Sir Thomas
In the beginning of the novel, he is an absent father and head of the household, and this is true whether he is off in the West Indies or at home. He does not take his proper place as father and lord of the manor. He also knows that his wife is unable or unwilling to play her part, so he allows Aunt Norris to become a dictator and rule his household. Later, though, he suddenly realizes the problems that his family is having are at least partially due to his abdication of responsibility, and he now begins to assert himself as head of household.
Lady Bertram
She seems totally detached from the family. Her main concerns seem to be herself and her dog. Again, near the end, when Tom becomes deathly ill, she rouses herself and spends most of her time at his bedside nursing him. This is a considerable change from her earlier behavior when the reader isn't sure whether she really is aware of anyone, aside from her pet dog, around her.
Tom
The eldest son plays to perfection the role of The Wastrel. He shows no interest in his studies at college, and demonstrates little concern nor for his duties and responsibilities as heir to Mansfield Park. It's party time is his philosophy. Shortly after his illness, he also changes his behavior and settles down at the university and begins to show an interest in his role as heir to Mansfield Park. There is also a hint of marriage, which is a major concern of every well-established family--the heir must marry and produce an heir of his own.
Edmund
While he is a serious and dedicated student, determined to be a good minister to his parish when he takes over, he also is infatuated by Mary Crawford, who would make a most inappropriate wife for the clergyman he wants to be. Again, at the end, he recognizes the folly of his infatuation and gradually comes to realize that Fanny is the woman most suited for him and his role in life.
Maria
The oldest daughter, selfish and self-absorbed, thinks only of herself. She makes a bad choice in her marriage, selecting a suitor who could never be a suitable partner but has a large house and a considerable fortune. For her follies she ends up in exile, supported by Sir Thomas, but banned, at least for now, from Mansfield Park.
Julia
She is strongly influenced by her older sister. Austen seems to suggest she would be a different person if she had a different older sister to model.
Aunt Norris
Sister to Lady Bertram and Mrs. Price (Fanny's mother)
She is the real power in the house. Unfortunately she is also evil, greedy, and malicious. She is the one who most deliberately torments Fanny, reminding regularly of her low position at Mansfield Park, barely one step above the servants. At the end, she realizes that Sir Thomas has recognized his error and has finally become the head of household he should have been long ago, and she elects to go into voluntary exile with Maria.
Mary and Henry Crawford
brother and sister, relatives to the minister at MP. They are bright, outgoing, attractive, as well as shallow, selfish, and self-absorbed. They are classic examples of the cliche that one can't tell a book by its cover. They are very popular at first, but by the end, they have revealed themselves take themselves off to London, perhaps to wonder for the rest of their lives just what they had missed out on.
Mansfield Park is the longest and most complex novel that Austen wrote. It is. in my estimation, the most misunderstood and misread novel as well. Austen's basic tenet, in all her works, is that one must look beneath the surface to determine the true nature of the other, and that true nature may be in opposition to what appears on the surface. I believe that too many readers have taken the surface appearances of many of the characters and stopped there, and therefore missing their true nature.
In any case, read and enjoy. I rank it a close second to Persuasion.
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Jane Austen: Sense and Sensibility
One of the pleasures available to those who have read many or all of Austen's novels is the echoes of her other novels that pop up now and then. I have just finished reading Sense and Sensibility (S&S) and several of these echoes are running around inside my skull.
One of these relates to the "villains" in both S&S and Pride and Prejudice, Willoughby and Wickham. Many others have noted that last names of the two villains begin with "W." One point I hadn't read is that one of the males who would marry one of the heroines in both novels, Darcy and Col. Brandon, has had a prior confrontation with the villain, and in both cases, it was over a young woman placed in the care of the hero. In both cases, the young woman had been placed in the home of another woman who was trusted by the hero.
Another echo comes from Lucy Steele, one of the most important secondary characters of S&S. She appears to be a younger version of Mrs. Norris of Mansfield Park (MP). Both carry the art of obsequious behavior to the powerful to a great degree and exhibit considerable cruelty to those either less powerful and not useful to them. Lucy flatters her way into the regard of numerous characters and manages to get free room and board for months at a time. Mrs. Norris flatters Sir Bertram while at the same time she treats Fanny, a powerless child and poor relative, with extreme cruelty.
Mrs. Norris is also one who wanders off with anything that seems to be unattached or ignored by all, including food and plants from places she visits. Lucy Steele, upon learning that the rectory is very close to Col Brandon's manor, resolves "to avail herself, at Delaford, as far as she possibly could, of his servants, his carriage, his cows, and his poultry.
Another echo of MP brings up Mary's letter to Fanny when she writes about wishing for the death of Edmund's older brother Tom, who was ill at that time. She insists that she's only thinking of the good that Edmund could do as the next Sir Bertram. I'm cynical enough to believe she's thinking more of being Lady of the Manor than of any good deeds Edmund might do.
In S&P, Willoughby bursts into the manor at Cleveland and charms Elinor into partially forgiving him and promising that she will tell his story to Marianne. Elinor now dreads telling Marianne for fear that Marianne now will never be happy with anyone else and "for a moment wished Willoughby a widower." She, of course, quickly changes her mind when she remembers Col. Brandon's constancy and devotion to Marianne.
The point is that even good people can have evil thoughts momentarily, but good people quickly reject them while others, such as Mary in MP, actually try to force such thoughts on others.
One of these relates to the "villains" in both S&S and Pride and Prejudice, Willoughby and Wickham. Many others have noted that last names of the two villains begin with "W." One point I hadn't read is that one of the males who would marry one of the heroines in both novels, Darcy and Col. Brandon, has had a prior confrontation with the villain, and in both cases, it was over a young woman placed in the care of the hero. In both cases, the young woman had been placed in the home of another woman who was trusted by the hero.
Another echo comes from Lucy Steele, one of the most important secondary characters of S&S. She appears to be a younger version of Mrs. Norris of Mansfield Park (MP). Both carry the art of obsequious behavior to the powerful to a great degree and exhibit considerable cruelty to those either less powerful and not useful to them. Lucy flatters her way into the regard of numerous characters and manages to get free room and board for months at a time. Mrs. Norris flatters Sir Bertram while at the same time she treats Fanny, a powerless child and poor relative, with extreme cruelty.
Mrs. Norris is also one who wanders off with anything that seems to be unattached or ignored by all, including food and plants from places she visits. Lucy Steele, upon learning that the rectory is very close to Col Brandon's manor, resolves "to avail herself, at Delaford, as far as she possibly could, of his servants, his carriage, his cows, and his poultry.
Another echo of MP brings up Mary's letter to Fanny when she writes about wishing for the death of Edmund's older brother Tom, who was ill at that time. She insists that she's only thinking of the good that Edmund could do as the next Sir Bertram. I'm cynical enough to believe she's thinking more of being Lady of the Manor than of any good deeds Edmund might do.
In S&P, Willoughby bursts into the manor at Cleveland and charms Elinor into partially forgiving him and promising that she will tell his story to Marianne. Elinor now dreads telling Marianne for fear that Marianne now will never be happy with anyone else and "for a moment wished Willoughby a widower." She, of course, quickly changes her mind when she remembers Col. Brandon's constancy and devotion to Marianne.
The point is that even good people can have evil thoughts momentarily, but good people quickly reject them while others, such as Mary in MP, actually try to force such thoughts on others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)