Welcome. What you will find here will be my random thoughts and reactions to various books I have read, films I have watched, and music I have listened to. In addition I may (or may not as the spirit moves me) comment about the fantasy world we call reality, which is far stranger than fiction.
Saturday, December 9, 2017
Emily Dickinson: "Success is counted sweetest"
No. 67
Success is counted sweetest
By those who ne'er succeed.
To comprehend a nectar
Requires sorest need.
Not one of all the purple Host
Who took the Flag today
Can tell the definition
So clear of Victory
As he defeated -- dying --
On whose forbidden ear
The distant strains of triumph
Burst agonized and clear!
-- Emily Dickinson --
The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson
For Emily Dickinson, this seems like a fairly straightforward poem. Only those who have never won can really appreciate victory. But, still, I wonder. How could one who has never experienced victory, realistically understand or comprehend it? The more I consider this poem, the more perplexed I become.
As usual, I must ask if I am missing something here in this poem by Dickinson.
Labels:
a poem,
DICKINSON Emily,
failure,
success
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
agree with RT as to the timing... but i also can see a discussion of time, pov, and a comparison of how being goal oriented can be self defeating: if goals, when attained, are meaningless, how does that effect our vision of the future...?
ReplyDeleteI think that what we do not have, is in some ways, is a much sweeter then what we do have. When n one is defeated, success will look very differently from the way that the victor sees it.
ReplyDeleteR.T., I saw it as more of a generic or universal statement, but, as you point out, it could result from a specific incident which led to a broader, more inclusive observation.
ReplyDeleteAs for changing explications, well, when I first read the poem, I thought I understood it (although I didn't necessarily agree with it). However, subsequent readings have only confused me.
Perhaps the best way to read ED is to ignore the common wisdom and stay with one's first impressions (which are usually looked down upon as faulty).
Mudpuddle and Brian, interesting and intriguing comments. I hadn't looked at all at the winner, just the loser, but I think you are on to something.
ReplyDeleteActually we are all losers, until we win or achieve our goal. Then we become a winner. Now, is the exhilaration of winning at the same level as what we anticipated it would be prior to winning?
I have often heard there's a letdown after achieving a goal one has struggled to achieve. This letdown of course would not be experienced by those who didn't win.
I wonder if that's what ED is referring to in the poem?
R.T., did she leave orders to destroy them? I had always heard that she gave up trying to get them published, which tells me she would be very gratified today to see their reception.
ReplyDeleteNow, there's always Kafka to talk about. I understand that he did give orders that all his writings were to be destroyed, which his friend obviously did not do.
R.T., Chuckle. . . go right ahead "into indelicate territory." A touch of indelicacy always adds flavor to the endeavour.
ReplyDeleteR.T., I don't know where you are going with this.
ReplyDeleteR.T., OK. I don't see the problem, though.
ReplyDelete